Quick answer
How do registrar jurisdictions compare?
As of October 2026, all 4 countries compared by PanamaRegistrar (Panama, Iceland, Costa Rica, United States) are parties to the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime. Only Iceland applies the GDPR. Of the three, only Panama has a bilateral criminal-evidence treaty with the US, in force since 1995. Panama enforces foreign judgments only after Supreme Court exequatur.
Key dates
| Budapest Convention, in force for Iceland | 1 May 2007 |
|---|---|
| Budapest Convention, in force for the United States | 1 January 2007 |
| Budapest Convention, in force for Panama | 1 July 2014 (accession deposited 5 March 2014) |
| Budapest Convention, in force for Costa Rica | 1 January 2018 (accession 22 September 2017) |
| US–Panama mutual legal assistance treaty | Signed 11 April 1991, in force 6 September 1995 |
| Panama's exequatur rules | Law 61 of 2015, articles 155 to 157 (in force since October 2015) |
| Panama's personal data law | Law 81 of 2019, in force 29 March 2021 |
The legal facts, country by country
Only points we could trace to an official or treaty source. 'Not confirmed' means we did not find an official text for this page; it does not mean the answer is no.
| Panama | Iceland | Costa Rica | United States | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party to the Budapest Convention (ETS 185) | Yes, in force 1 July 2014 (accession) | Yes, in force 1 May 2007 (ratified 29 January 2007) | Yes, in force 1 January 2018 (accession) | Yes, in force 1 January 2007 |
| GDPR applies on its territory | No (not in the EU or EEA) | Yes (EEA member) | No (not in the EU or EEA) | No (not in the EU or EEA) |
| General personal data law | Law 81 of 2019, in force 29 March 2021 | The GDPR, through the EEA Agreement | Not confirmed for this page | Not confirmed for this page |
| Bilateral criminal-evidence treaty (MLAT) with the US | Yes, in force 6 September 1995 | None listed by the US Justice Department (April 2022) | None listed by the US Justice Department (April 2022) | Not applicable |
| Recognition of foreign civil judgments | Exequatur by the Supreme Court's Fourth Chamber (Law 61 of 2015, arts. 155–157) | Not confirmed for this page | Not confirmed for this page | Not confirmed for this page |
| Prosecutor's order to produce stored data | Yes: Code of Criminal Procedure art. 338-C (Law 478 of 2025) | Not confirmed for this page | Not confirmed for this page | Not confirmed for this page |
| Intermediary liability rule | Hosts liable only after a competent authority declares content unlawful (Law 51 of 2008, arts. 87–91) | Not confirmed for this page | Not confirmed for this page | Not confirmed for this page |
| Registrars and hosts based there (examples) | PanamaRegistrar | OrangeWebsite, 1984 Hosting, FlokiNET (also Romania and Finland) | Njalla (njalla.srl, since late 2024, secondary source) | Namecheap (Arizona), Porkbun (Oregon), Epik LLC, Incognet (Wyoming); Verisign, the .com registry (Virginia) |
Prices checked on
Budapest dates: UN Treaty Series (Panama), WIPO Lex (Iceland, Costa Rica), US Justice Department (United States). The Council of Europe chart blocked automated reading on 19 October 2026; check it in a browser for the latest status.
Which treaties let foreign police reach a registrar?
Two layers matter: the Budapest Convention and bilateral treaties. All four countries are parties to the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime. Police in each can therefore ask the others to preserve and produce computer data. The convention works between governments. A foreign prosecutor still needs the local authority to act.
Bilateral treaties add a faster channel with the United States. The US Justice Department's April 2022 list of mutual legal assistance treaties includes Panama, in force since 6 September 1995. It lists no bilateral treaty with Iceland or Costa Rica.
In Panama, the local step is now clearly written. Law 478 of 2025 added article 338-C to the Code of Criminal Procedure. It lets the Ministerio Público order a person or company to supply computer data in its possession. That is why our rule reads: We release the data we hold only when Panamanian law requires it (a Panamanian court or prosecutor's order), or in a UDRP case. See data disclosure and law enforcement.
Does the GDPR apply to my registrar?
It applies on the territory of Iceland, because Iceland is part of the European Economic Area. An Icelandic registrar or host processes your data under GDPR rules, enforced by Iceland's data protection authority.
Panama, Costa Rica and the United States are outside the EEA. The GDPR can still reach a company there that offers services to people in the EU, under its article 3(2). That is a question about the customers a company targets, not about its home country.
Panama has its own data law. Law 81 of 2019 came into force on 29 March 2021 and is supervised by ANTAI, the national transparency authority. Its article 24 requires data to be handed to competent judicial authorities on a proper request, and it excludes bulk requests. The Panama domain law page sets out the other articles.
How does a foreign court judgment become binding in Panama?
Through exequatur before the Fourth Chamber (General Affairs) of Panama's Supreme Court. The rules are in articles 155 to 157 of Law 61 of 2015, the Code of Private International Law.
Article 156 sets four conditions:
- The foreign court was competent and did not invade an area reserved to Panamanian courts.
- The judgment was not given in default: the defendant was personally served and could defend.
- It does not breach fundamental principles of Panamanian public order.
- The copy is authentic and translated into Spanish.
Without a treaty, article 155 adds reciprocity: enforcement can be refused if the other country is shown not to enforce Panamanian judgments. Until a judgment passes this filter, it does not bind PanamaRegistrar. That is the core of our takedown procedure. We did not confirm the equivalent rules in Iceland, Costa Rica or the United States for this page.
Which registrars are based in each country?
The examples below come from our October 2026 research on registrars; each is sourced on the best offshore domain registrars page.
- Panama: PanamaRegistrar, operated by DomaineGoat LLC. The .pa country-code registry is sponsored by the Universidad Tecnológica de Panamá, per IANA.
- Iceland: OrangeWebsite, 1984 Hosting (1984 ehf) and FlokiNET, which also operates in Romania and Finland.
- Costa Rica: Njalla, through njalla.srl since late 2024, according to a September 2025 blog post.
- United States: Namecheap (Phoenix, Arizona), Porkbun (Oregon), Epik LLC (owned by Registered Agents Inc.) and Incognet (Wyoming). Verisign, which runs .com and .net, is in Reston, Virginia.
Comparisons with each one: Njalla, OrangeWebsite, Namecheap, Porkbun, Epik.
Does the registrar's country matter if the registry is elsewhere?
Yes, but only for what the registrar holds. The registrar's country decides who can order it to hand over your account data, change your DNS or suspend your domain at registrar level. The registry's country decides who can lock or move the domain at its source.
For a .com, the registry is Verisign in the United States, whatever registrar you use. For a .de it is DENIC in Germany; for a .ch, SWITCH in Switzerland. Pairing a Panamanian service with a registry outside a given country is a legitimate way to choose the legal systems that apply. It is not protection from your own country's courts.
The registry jurisdiction index lists the registry country for each of our 43 extensions. Prices are on the price list: a .com costs $11.99.
Questions about registrar jurisdictions
Is Panama part of the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime?
Yes. Panama deposited its instrument of accession on 5 March 2014. The convention took effect for Panama on 1 July 2014, according to the UN Treaty Series. Costa Rica followed on 1 January 2018. Iceland and the United States were already parties, since 2007. The convention organises cooperation between authorities, not orders from private parties.
Does the United States have a legal assistance treaty with Panama?
Yes. The US–Panama mutual legal assistance treaty was signed on 11 April 1991 and entered into force on 6 September 1995. It lets each government request evidence from the other through central authorities. The US Justice Department's April 2022 list shows no such bilateral treaty with Iceland or Costa Rica.
Does the GDPR protect domains registered in Panama?
Not as Panamanian law. Panama is outside the EU and the EEA, so its own Law 81 of 2019 governs personal data there. The GDPR can still apply to a non-EU company that offers services to people in the EU. Iceland, as an EEA member, applies the GDPR directly.
Can a US judgment be enforced against a Panamanian registrar?
Only after exequatur by the Fourth Chamber of Panama's Supreme Court, under Law 61 of 2015. The court checks jurisdiction, proper service on the defendant, Panamanian public order and an authentic Spanish translation. A US court can, however, give orders directly to Verisign, the .com registry, in Virginia.
Which country is best for a domain registrar?
None is best for every case; each choice trades one set of rules for another. Iceland adds GDPR rules. Panama adds an exequatur filter and a treaty with the US. Costa Rica has no bilateral treaty on the US Justice Department's list. PanamaRegistrar chose Panama and publishes how it applies its law.
Why does PanamaRegistrar mention prosecutor orders?
Because Panamanian law makes them binding. Article 338-C of the Code of Criminal Procedure was added by Law 478 of 2025. It lets the Ministerio Público order a company to supply data it holds. Our rule therefore reads: We release the data we hold only when Panamanian law requires it (a Panamanian court or prosecutor's order), or in a UDRP case.
Sources (16)
- Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 185 (Convention on Cybercrime) — Council of Europe Treaty Office (checked 2026-10-19 (automated access blocked))
- Convention on Cybercrime: Panama accession (deposit 5 March 2014, in effect 1 July 2014) — United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 2993 (registered 2014-06-24, checked 2026-10-19)
- Convention on Cybercrime: Iceland — WIPO Lex (checked 2026-10-19)
- Convention on Cybercrime: Costa Rica — WIPO Lex (checked 2026-10-19)
- Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties of the United States — US Department of Justice, Office of International Affairs (April 2022, checked 2026-10-19)
- Panama (95-906): Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty — US Department of State (checked 2026-10-19)
- Senate Executive Report 104-3 (US–Panama MLAT) — US Senate (1995-05-05)
- Ley 61 de 7 de octubre de 2015 (Código de Derecho Internacional Privado), arts. 155–157 — Asamblea Nacional (Legispan) (2015-10-08, checked 2026-10-19)
- Ley 81 de 26 de marzo de 2019 (protección de datos personales) — Gaceta Oficial No. 28743-A (Legispan copy) (2019-03-29, checked 2026-10-19)
- Ley 478 de 4 de agosto de 2025 (Código Procesal Penal art. 338-C) — Gaceta Oficial No. 30337 (2025-08-05, checked 2026-10-19)
- Ley 51 de 22 de julio de 2008 (documentos y firmas electrónicas), arts. 87–91 — Gaceta Oficial No. 26090 (Ministerio Público copy) (2008-07-24, checked 2026-10-19)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), article 3 — EUR-Lex (checked 2026-10-19)
- The EEA Agreement — EFTA (checked 2026-10-19)
- Root Zone Database: .pa — IANA (updated 2026-09-29, checked 2026-10-19)
- Root Zone Database: .com — IANA (checked 2026-10-19)
- Njalla has silently changed: a word of caution — Independent blog (2025-09-14)